LuxuryBlurb

Posts Tagged ‘location’

LOCATION MATTERS, EVEN IN POLITICS!

Saturday, February 25th, 2012

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on February 24th, 2012

Location, location, location, the first three most important rules for the best real estate and yes, this rule even applies in politics!  Mitt Romney learned this painful lesson yesterday while delivering a speech in Detroit to a group of 1,000….in Ford Field, an arena that can hold 65,000 people. 64,000 empty seats never looks good for an event. Wrong location!

Yet again, the right location is everything. I hear this same message from other groups too:

RETAILERS: They always prefer being on the East side of a North-West flowing street….why? Shoppers tend to come out later in the day as the sun is overhead and heading west. That leaves the east side of the street sunny and cheerful….and more attractive to shoppers, especially for smaller retailers.

RESTAURANTS: Most restaurants rely surprisngly heavily on walk-in traffic: No walk in traffic, and the chances of paying sky-high rents and making a profit are tough.

ART GALLERIES: While there are a few that like to exist on their own, separated, the majority like to be clustered. This makes life for art buyers, critics and viewers more convenient, and it also maximizes exposure, especially if you are aq newer gallery with less of a following.

FOOD STORES:  If you want to know where neighborhoods are gentrifying with almost certainty, look out for a Whole Foods. They spend big bucks analyzing trends, building permits, transportation, street traffic, pedestrian traffic, etc to locate their stores in the most prominent up-and-coming neighborhoods……anaylisis you don’t have to pay for! Remember Houston and the Bowery before Whole Foods came along? Or how south of Chambers Street in Tribeca was poo-pooed….till that Whole Foods opened at 101 Warren Street….and all of a sudden that location became prime! So will a Whole Foods go into the West Chelsea 28th Street and Eleventh Avenue site? It certainly makes sense with the Highline Park, Hudson Yards, The Americano Hotel, a new subway stop at 34th Street and 11th Avenue, not to mention the thousands of new homeowners and renters that have moved there recently….  I used to live at 225 Fifth Avenue and every morning and evening I would see hundreds of tourists at Madison Square Park wondering around staring at the Flatiron and Empire State buildings…..the owners of EATALY must have seen what I saw!

Super-cool boutique hotels and restaurants can have the same effect….think the ACE HOTEL.  Around the corner a new Starbucks just opened….

Leonard Steinberg says: Good location has everything to do with simple, common sense and nature: Have you ever tried planting sun-loving flowers in a shady spot?

OCCUPY WALL STREET? IT’S ALL ABOUT THE WRONG LOCATION!

Saturday, October 15th, 2011

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on October 15th, 2011

As OCCUPY WALL STREET continues, I feel its connection to the real estate world and how location is everything. Do these demonstrators know nothing about how one block can make all the difference in New York? Firstly, the title is about as accurate as WOODSTOCK, the era-defining music festival that never really happened in the town of Woodstock at all, just close by. These demonstarations are somewhat mis-located: almost like buying an apartment in Gramercy Park, yet being unable to see a single leaf of the park. Or living in Tribeca, but living in a building East of Broadway?

I understand the average salary of all those working on Wall Street currently is around $ 70,000/year, certainly not the fortunes that qualify as the target audience. Of course abongst bankers, that average is closer to $ 340,000.00/year. Frankly, I always thought the real wealth of Manhattan was focused more in Mid-town? Scarier is the fact that this group has LOTS in common with the Tea Party movement, although I do think (joking aside) that many of this group’s grievances (which as yet are badly focused) are somewhat legitimate. Until this great country of ours acknowledges the huge disparity in incomes between the super-rich and everyone else, social unrest will continue. But it had better become intelligent soon. $250k/year in Manhattan is not rich. And if everyone who is rich is removed from Manhattan, the parks will wilt, the public services will be destroyed, and worse:  large chunks of real estate transfer taxes will be removed from the State’s coffers, adding further pain to the already struggling state…..remember Manhattan supports the rest of New York State? We cannot forget that while certain super-rich individuals escape the Federal taxation the masses support, but no homeowner in New York escapes real estate taxes. About 30% of Manhattan is owned real estate, and those owners are paying LOTS in real estate taxes. LOTS. A typical 2,000sf apartment pays around $ 24,000 per year….. A 5,000sf apartment could pay 50k per year or more. Townhouses and some apartments do pay lots less (unfairly) which is a disgrace.

OCCUPY WALL STREET should clearly identify what they are for rather than what they are against. It’s easy to complain. It’s really tough to provide solutions. Realistic, workable solutions.  Naive dreaming is the last thing we need right now. Maybe we are all learning to adjust to a new terrifying reality: Is man being replaced by machines en masse now? And are those who control the machines automatically reaping the biggest rewards, bigger than anything we have ever seen or known because no-one ever imagined the human consequences of an un-re-educated population in the MASS computer age?

DOES BEST LOCATION = WORST QUALITY RESTAURANT?

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

I am currently traveling in Europe researching trends and getting a breather: it ceases to amaze me how many restaurants located in the very best, most desirable, attractive locations seem to have the worst food and service. Is this an international phenomena?

Thinking of New York City, I guess the definition of ‘best location’ helps determine the quality of the restaurant. But I certainly can think of many prized locations in the city that do indeed deliver some of the worst food and service. Often the best restaurants in these prize locations are grossly over-rated. Just because you have a great location are you entitled to give those dreaded tourists the worst possible experience? I think Cities should fine rotten restaurants in great locations for bad service and quality, or at least give them a rating on the front door, a badge of shame…..

“In real estate it truly is all about location,” says Leonard Steinberg, managing director of Prudential Douglas Elliman and leader of the LUXURYLOFT team. “It is unfortunate when a retail establishment abuses a prize location. It is done so at the detriment of the town or city. Thankfully blogs have helped identify the worst offenders. Maybe an I-Phone APP for this is an idea, warning un-informed tourists not to enter a rotten restaurant?”