Posts Tagged ‘interest rates’
Thursday, November 7th, 2013
Posted by Leonard Steinberg on November 7th, 2013
The European Central Bank cut interest rates to a new record low on Thursday, responding to a slump in inflation that has sparked fears the euro zone’s economic recovery could stall. Is this a move as a result of too much government spending and over-taxing? Were taxes raised before these economies recovered? Growth of the economy and balancing budgets is the key to a successful, sustainable recovery: Balance the budget with cuts then move on: it’s called “personal responsibility” something sorely lacking in our world. Pandering to different groups for the sake of votes and elections just delays the pain, a pain felt mostly by the people the ‘system’ is trying to help. Governments do not create jobs, they simply transfer wealth and that is not something anyone can live with….most of Europe is BROKE. If industries and the wealthy move out, jobs go with them and growth declines making things worse. its a cruel system at times but dealing with the truth and reality, however hard it may be, is the only solution. Only once an economy truly improves should you tax higher to curb inflation. Deflation is worse. Record high unemployment in the euro zone is pressuring wages and spending, and banks are still reluctant to lend to the real economy, another key source of growth.
Elected officials should look at this closely: California Governor Brown is doing a remarkable job of being a centrist, pragmatic leader, when all believed he was a nutty left-wing liberal out of control…..California has a balanced budget, a combination of entitlement cuts, tax hikes AND incentives for commerce. I suspect Mayor-elect de Blasio will be equally smart about our City and economy.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013
Posted by Leonard Steinberg on June 5th, 2013
The Wall Street Journal asks the question whether rising interest rates could stop the improving housing markets in the USA. Interest rates have climbed past 4% in the past month. The truth of the housing market is that in the hardest hit areas, prices fell so low as to be below the future expected cash flows from their rental values. So Wall Street stepped in with bag-loads of very cheap cash(yes, that is why it is mostly cash sales because no one else has that kind of cash), to take advantage of these distressed bargains. This could explain why this housing recovery has been so narrow and bifurcated.
If interest rates rise, the return on investment models will become more challenging to hit. It doesn’t matter if they have no “mortgage”, the rate of return is benchmarked versus something and 10-year Treasuries is probably one benchmark used. The buyer needing a mortgage will have tougher hurdles to hit to be eligible under Fannie and Freddie “conforming loan” rules, especially since so many middle class workers are experiencing declining real wages. All of this barely applies to real estate sales in Manhattan, but this could certainly alter the mood of the US markets in general.
Saturday, February 16th, 2013
Posted by Leonard Steinberg on February 16th, 2013
It’s official in the mainstream press(although looking in the rear-view mirror is often a bit late): housing prices across the board are rising: Prices for single-family homes climbed in almost 88 percent of U.S. cities in the fourth quarter as the housing recovery broadened. The best-performing metro area was Phoenix, where prices increased 34 percent from a year earlier. I am estimating escalation in Manhattan this year of around 10-15% and I fear that escalation has already happened, with jaw-dropping speed…….just as we predicted a few months ago. It will take a while for many buyers to adjust to the ‘new normal’. Once upon a time, $ 1,000/sf seemed like a steep price to pay……now that’s what you pay for a storage room. The effects of LUXOFLATION have taken hold. Remember what Mayor Bloomberg said a few years ago: until the housing market recovers, there will be no recovery. Now one could be certain that economic recovery has officially begun.
The median sales price rose from a year earlier in 133 of 152 metropolitan areas measured, the National Association of Realtors said in a report yesterday. In the third quarter, 120 areas had gains. An improving job market and low interest rates are driving up prices by fueling demand for a tightening supply of listings. The national median price for an existing single-family home was $178,900 in the fourth quarter, up 10 percent from the same period last year. That was the biggest gain since 2005, according to the Realtors group.
So what’s next? Rising interest rates? Sub-prime mortgages? Excessive home equity loans? Hopefully the folly of previous cycles is not repeated…..
Friday, September 21st, 2012
Posted by Leonard Steinberg on September 21st, 2012
Interest rates are at record lows, so financing a property today is more affordable than ever. Here are some disturbing facts to absorb:
1) Is everyone who has a mortgage and takes the tax deduction part of Mitt Romney’s 47%?…..the mortage deduction is a government subsidized handout….basically. I know many New York real estate owners who take this ‘handout’ who would never vote for Obama…. How disgraceful and stupid of Romney not to see this and a host of other government handouts and ‘breaks’ that benefit more than just Obama voters….and how absurd of Obama to ‘feel’ for the poor 47% when so many of them are not poor at all. Both look ridiculous!
2) Yes, mortgage rates are super-low….but QUALIFYING for a mortgage is much, much tougher (a good thing!)….so ultimately the beneficiaries of low interest rates are primarily the wealthy. Some of the requirements to qualify for a mortgage these days border on the absurd, and the appraisal process has become a bit of a joke.
Friday, September 14th, 2012
Posted on September 14th by Leonard Steinberg
Fed. chief Ben Bernanke delivered some great news for the financial markets and especially real estate land: he plans on keeping interest rate low ‘well into 2015′: That bodes especially well for New York real estate buyers who currently confronted with ultra-limited inventory of existing apartments will feel safer buying into the new slew of new construction buildings (150 Charles Street, 560 West 24th Street, 7 Harrison Street, 71 Laight Street, 1107 Broadway, etc) that will only be deliverable 12-24 months from now. The effects of these comments on the stock market did not hurt either….
Much of this promise will depend on whether Bernanke is still the Fed chief in 2015….Of course, Bernanke could always serve a third term as Fed chairman. But there are two problems with that. First, he’d have to be offered the job, something Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney has vowed not to do. Its also not clear if Bernanke would even take the job. He has not commented on the matter publicly, but acquaintances speculate that he wouldn’t.
Wednesday, January 25th, 2012
Posted by Leonard Steinberg on January 25th, 2012
Some good news for the real estate markets (and markets in general): To-day the Federal Reserve pushed back the likely timing of an eventual interest rate hike until late 2014, much later than it had previously said, as it nurses a still-sluggish economic recovery. In a historic step toward greater transparency, the Fed announced an official inflation target of 2 percent. Three of the 17 policymakers expect rates will need to rise this year and two others did not see any increase until 2016.
Low interest rates are historically good for the residential real estate market, and this indication for the future is healthy, although it certainly will remove any urgency a buyer may have had they believed a rates rise was imminent. For new developments it is especially important, as a buyer committing to-day to buy in a new building that could only close in 2013 or 2014 has some measure of re-assurance that rates will not rise, or rise significantly at the time they are ready to close.
Now lets hope that 2% inflation target can be maintained: all indicators in Manhattan lead me to believe otherwise. Then again, the official inflation rate does not take into account the cost of housing, fuel or food (believe it or not!) even though rents and food costs rose close to 10% in 2011 in New York.
Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010
What will be the results of to-day’s election? Chances are we will see a distinct shift to the right nationally, although locally the shift will be less pronounced we imagine. How will this all affect New York real estate? Here are our predictions:
1) GREEN BUILDING: This area will be less supported by the Federal government, although we think the movement is so strong already, private enterprise will trump government and the shift towards more self-sustaining green construction will continue and escalate regardless. Private enterprise is ruled by profits, and green building, while expensive at first, may just be cost-effective over the longterm. And the New York luxury buyer is beginning to demand it.
2) TAXES: A lesser tax burden on New Yorkers will only fuel more spending. That cannot hurt. If (IF) corporations feel they will have a lower tax burden, they may actually start spending the trillions of dollars they have stashed away…..that could fuel jobs, corporate profits, and corporate spending on equipment and infrastructure. More jobs means fewer people reliant on the State’s coffers….more money in Albany means less stress on the State to further raise taxes (we pray!). All of this adds up to more money for real estate.
3) INTEREST RATES: With tighter fiscal policies, it may be possible that we will see the end of the very low interest rates, especially if any signs of inflation appear.
So what do you think will happen after this election?
Monday, July 26th, 2010
Reported in the Wall Street Journal, a trend seems to be emerging whereby some intrepid homeowners are intentionally taking a loss on their current house—and writing a big check to retire their old mortgage—in order to buy twice the home for not much more money. Others, eschewing conventional personal-finance advice, are even opting for “cash-in” refinancings, paying thousands of dollars out of pocket to settle old loans—and then taking out new mortgages with lower payments, shorter durations or both. This trend may not be as accutely noticeable in the Manhattan luxury market, but in a market where pricing is down, there really is not better time for upgrading. Selling a $ 1million apartment for a 15% loss will net roughly $ 850,000.00, or a $ 150,000.00 loss. If you are cashing out, thats a simple loss. If you are buying an apartment that would have sold for $ 3 million when you bought your $ 1 million apartment, if the $ 3million apartment is down 15% in value too, that would mean you could buy it for about $ 2,55million, or a savings of $ 450,000.00……making your net gain about $ 300,000.00. Now throw in lower mortgage rates and the upside becomes even more appealing.
LUXURYlesson: In real estate, focus on ‘balance-sheet-thinking’ rather than ‘single-transaction-thinking’.