LuxuryBlurb

Posts Tagged ‘foreclosures’

IS HOME OWNERSHIP FADING IN FAVOR OF RENTING?

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on April 24th, 2012

The press is reporting that the U.S. homeownership rate may fall two percentage points to 64 percent, below historic norms, amid about six million additional foreclosures and tight lending standards, according to Pacific Investment Management Co.’s Scott Simon. This translates to about 4 million homeowners turning into renters.

Homeownership has declined from 69.2 percent in 2004, the highest on record, after loose credit and soaring property values drew buyers into the market, according to the Census Bureau. While owning is now “incredibly cheap” compared with renting for consumers who can qualify for loans, relatively few Americans can take advantage of the opportunity. The proportion of Americans owning their homes averaged 64.5 percent in the 1970s and 1980s. U.S. home prices are down 35 percent on average from a 2006 peak, after declining in February to the lowest since 2002, according to S&P/Case-Shiller index data on value in 20 markets released today. Prices are poised to drop an additional three or four percent before bottoming during the next 12 months according to Simon.

While many blame the glut of approximately 4 million homes that were over-built on reckless homeowners/buyers, the actions of banks and the inaction of government, especially Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, I think a large chunk of the blame lies on the charlatans (TV shows, info-mmercials, books, advisers, TV personalities, brokers, friends, etc) who peddled the concept of home-buying as a Las Vegas-style gambling hall: This vast pool of ‘flippers’ helped fuel unrealistic, unjustified price gains that fueled an unrealistic volume of building. Fortunately for Manhattan, the pool of investor buyers was very, very small, and for the most part the investors were very wealthy. With New York comprising approximately 70% of rental properties the chances for over-building condos was always automatically minimized, although not all escaped unscathed. The last 3 years have proven to be the GREAT EQUALIZER, showcasing how those properties that experienced price escalation just because of averages, have dropped in value, while many that were somewhat depressed by these averages have soared. Yes, some properties will see a 6-10% price escalation in 2012: Others will not, and some may even see a small decline.

Personally, I am witnessing broad RENTER FATIGUE in New York: The New York Times recently addressed this issue how for the first time in years, many renters faced with increasing rents are turning to homeownership (with low rate financing) as a very viable alternative. I am seeing this on all ends of the budget spectrum. So while we all said that things would never be the same 3 years ago, I feel homeownership as the ultimate goal will return to the US, and rates of ownership will start to rise in about 3 years as the cycle unfolds…….in short, I think the trend towards renting versus owning is a temporary one.

U. S. MORTGAGE RELIEF PROGRAM ON ROBO-SIGNED FORECLOSURES ALMOST AGREED UPON.

Monday, February 6th, 2012

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on February 6th, 2012

A deal is about to be agreed upon for the Obama led multibillion-dollar mortgage relief settlement to address foreclosure abuses by large banks between 2007 and 2011. The potential support from California and New York comes in exchange for tightening provisions of the settlement to preserve the right to investigate past misdeeds by banks, and stepping up oversight to ensure that the financial institutions live up to the deal and distribute the money to the hardest-hit homeowners.

The settlement would require banks (not the government, although new fees will probably be levied on all of us to pay for this) to provide billions of dollars in aid to homeowners who have lost their homes to foreclosure or who are still at risk, after years of failed attempts by the White House and other government officials to alter the behavior of the biggest banks.

The banks — led by the five biggest mortgage servicers, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — want to settle an investigation into abuses set off in 2010 by evidence that they foreclosed on borrowers with only a cursory examination of the relevant documents, a practice known as robo-signing. Four million homeowners have lost their homes to foreclosure since the beginning of 2007.

The deal would set aside up to $17 billion specifically to pay for principal reductions and other relief for approximately a million borrowers who are behind on their payments but owe more than their houses are currently worth. I think allowing for re-financing at lower rates makes more sense personally.

The deal would also provide checks for about $2,000 to roughly 750,000 who lost homes to foreclosure.

If banks fall short of the multibillion-dollar benchmarks set out for principal reduction and other benefits for homeowners, they will have to pay the difference plus a penalty of up to 40 percent directly to the federal government.

The settlement, if all states participate, will also include $3 billion to lower the rates of mortgage holders who are current. Banks will get more credit for reducing principal owed and helping families keep their homes, and less for short sales or taking losses on loans that were likely to go bad, like those that were severely delinquent.

The big questions I have are:  if the banks acted fraudulently, why just a slap on the wrist? Surely much larger fines or worse, jail-time would be appropriate? Then again, what if a good chunk of these foreclosed homeowners simply got in over their heads and are not taking any responsibility for their actions? What about the vast majority of responsible homeowners and credit worthy propspective home buyers who are not in default and are hurt by perpetuating uncertaintly and the rationing of credit? Cleaning up the housing mess is critical to the full recovery of our economy. Hopefully this is not another example of how the corrupt get away with crimes, or those who gamble escape accountability for their irresponsible actions….maybe its a bit of both?