LuxuryBlurb

Posts Tagged ‘economy’

CORNELL UNIVERSITY WINS SCIENCE CAMPUS: GREAT NEWS FOR NEW YORK’S ECONOMY

Monday, December 19th, 2011

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on December 19th, 2011

Cornell University is the winner of a competition to build a new science and engineering campus in the city: An official announcement from Mayor Michael Bloomberg is expected later today.

The city has offered free land on Roosevelt Island and up to $100 million worth of infrastructure. In a major sign of strength, the Cornell bid received a $350 million anonymous donation to help build the campus. Stanford University — another top contender — announced Friday it was pulling its bid.

City officials hope a new school will spawn hundreds of new companies, along with tens of thousands of jobs and billions in economic activity over the next three decades. Now THAT’S what I call a strong plan for long term AND short term job creation:  jobs for design and building now, and a school that will be a draw for the best from around the country and the world. Now if only Mr. Bloomberg (or a clone) went to Washington……wouldn’t it be nice if all these “presidential” political hacks actually provided this kind of thinking as opposed to their tired, pathetic, partisan drivel.

New York’s future looks bright indeed.

IS THE ANSWER TO U.S. UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE NAME STEVE JOBS?

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on October 6, 2011

With Steve Job’s passing, certainly one of the greatest losses of 2011, it may be a good time to look at his company as a case study for the future of other companies in the USA. I write this on a MAC, own an I-pad, I-pod and love them all. These inventions have revolutionized our lives and have especially made life as a real estate broker better. Does the answer to the USA’s horrible unemployment rate lie in the name Steve Jobs?

Lets be blunt about Apple’s success, a huge success, and one of America’s greatest:  Genius product is designed in the United States….The company employs about 35,000 people in the USA.  Most of its products are manufactured (cheaply) in China.  About 300,000 jobs are in China. Yes, 35,000 in the USA, 300,000 in China. The super-low cost of production translates to a super-profitable company. Apple sits on $ 76 billion in cash reserves. The questions we should be asking now are:

1) If Apple manufactured its products in the USA, would it be the success it is to-day?

2) If Apple had half its cash reserves because it sacrificed some of its profits to produce some of its goods domestically would these employed Americans have the capacity to consume more (thereby creating more consumers for Apple products….and real estate!) and maybe lifting Apple’s sales (and profits) pretty close to where they are to-day?

3)Would Apple be the success it is to-day if its profits were lower? Would Wall Street have abandoned the company?

4) Why does Apple not pay a dividend to its shareholders?

5) $ 76 billion would pay for over 300,000 US jobs paying $ 50,000/year for five years. Those 300,000 jobs in China do not result in many Apple product consumers as they are mostly low paying jobs. Which jobs would serve Apple AND the USA best?

My big picture question about Apple is the same question I ask about many other highly successful US companies that manufacture most of their goods in China: Had we kept most of these jobs in the USA, would the additional manufacturing costs with reduced profits have produced less of a return than a much lower unemployment rate with a much healthier and stronger (consuming) middle class that may indeed have compensated for the loss in profits by being in a position to spend more?

The lesson from Apple is that it, like many other companies, have indeed been creating hundreds of thousands of jobs, but not in the USA. These jobs were shipped off to China to boost profits. It has worked. The only problem is it has left some companies super-profitable, and their owners super-rich, but it has left the US economy in deep trouble. What has happened is the same as what happened to the small retailer: Large retailers with huge buying power buying directly from manufactures, could cut pricing dramatically while retaining profitability…..thereby driving small retailers out of business. Think of the middle class as a small retailer. The sooner we resolve the unemployment crisis, the sooner foreclosure sales will slow and Americans will be in a better position to own a home…..and start consuming without government assistance. The more people are earning, the more taxes are collected…..is it time for some trickle up economics?

There has to be a happy compromise somewhere. But it will require some honesty.

HOUSE SWAP, ECONOMY-BOOSTER STYLE?

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

The economy is experiencing a unique problem:  unemployed people who are able to find good jobs in alternative cities are unable to take the jobs as they cannot sell their homes as many mortgages are worth more than the homes in this current market.

Why not introduce a NATIONAL HOUSE-TRADE BANK/DATA BASE, whereby someone could trade their home and mortgage for someone else’s similar home/mortgage value in the City they need to move to? Whereas both properties would still retain an inflated value in to-day’s market, over time this will correct itself, but more importantly, it will minimize the significant expense of foreclosure to the economy and speed up hiring.

“This could boost the economy by helping those un-employed to take a job, thus reducing stress on the government funding, and also reduce the number of foreclosures and sales happening below market values,” says Leonard Steinberg, managing director of Prudential Douglas Elliman and leader of the LUXURYLOFT team. “An employed person spends more, thereby boosting the economy a third way. It’s time for politicians and banks to get creative and practical!”

JOB CREATION IN NEW YORK CITY BEATS REST OF US.

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

CRAIN’s reports:   After more than a year in which Greenhouse IT couldn’t land a single sales meeting, the company has finally gotten its foot in the door at city businesses over the past three months to pitch its workstation, server and network-management services.

“The good news is, companies are ready to talk,” says Simon Binder, managing partner. “The bad news is, they’re still reluctant to make decisions.”

Local executives like Mr. Binder are frequently turning to the phrase “cautious optimism” to describe the glimmers of light they see in the recovery. Yet when the rebound here is compared with what’s happening in the rest of the U.S., a brighter picture emerges: New York City has capitalized on growth in a mix of industries that were never crushed by the recession in order to bounce back faster than the country as a whole.

News last week that the U.S. recovery is losing momentum raised fears of a potential “double-dip” recession. That could crimp the city’s progress, of course, since New York’s fortunes are ultimately tied to the nation’s. But tourism is thriving, office vacancy rates have started to drop, and the five boroughs added jobs at a brisker clip than the rest of the country in the first six months of the year. The city has even managed so far to sidestep many of the public-sector layoffs that are thinning state and municipal work forces nationwide.

In the first half, the city economy grew by 1.7% (or 51,500 jobs), compared with 0.6% for the U.S. (593,000 jobs), according to an analysis of state Department of Labor data by real estate services firm Eastern Consolidated.

One reason the city has topped the nation: It relies less than other metro areas do on construction and manufacturing, which have been battered throughout the U.S. in the downturn.

On the flip side, New York was buoyed by gains in restaurants and retail trade, which both were boosted as business travel to the city picked up. Retail outlets recorded the largest gain of any city sector, showing a 10,500-job spike through June, while restaurants added 7,000 jobs, Eastern Consolidated reports.

Restaurateur David Kostman, co-founder and CEO of Nanoosh, has actually used the downturn to expand his roster of hummus eateries from one to four, spurred in part by the availability of cheaper space.

“For the last year, the big chains didn’t grow, and a lot of the banks were shutting down,” Mr. Kostman says. “We were able to get premier locations—and the prices were significantly lower.”

Securities firms shed 2,700 jobs in the first half, but the losses likely would have been much steeper had it not been for the federal government’s billions of dollars in bank bailouts, which ended up having a disproportionate impact on the city. And the overall finance sector recovered strongly, bolstered by a strong showing in real estate, which added 3,200 jobs. (Real estate has not held up nearly as well nationally, dropping 25,100 jobs through June.)

NEW YORKERS ARE FINDING JOBS

While the city and the U.S. share an unemployment rate of 9.5%, New York’s rate is more of a positive indicator. The city has shaved a full percentage point off its unemployment rate despite the fact that its work force has grown by 7,900, or 0.2%, since its previous peak in June 2009. Meanwhile, the nation’s work force has fallen by 1.9 million, or 1.2%, since its last peak in May 2009, as the unemployed have grown discouraged and given up looking for jobs.

“It’s a very good thing to see New York’s unemployment rate falling even though the labor force is growing,” says Marisa Di Natale of Moody’s Economy.com. “It means people coming back into the labor force or moving into the city are actually finding jobs.”

Plenty of indicators beyond the employment rolls point to New York’s relative health.

Hotel occupancy rates are up—checking in at nearly 90% in May, up from a low of 68% in the first quarter of 2009, according to Colliers PKF Consulting USA. The average price per room is still below prerecession levels, but the growth in occupancy comes despite a surge of hotel openings over the past 18 months.

“Throughout the downturn, we lost ground in individual business travel and business groups,” John Fox, a Colliers senior vice president, says of the New York hotel market. “And that’s where we’ve seen a lot of this recovery [lately].”

The city’s commercial office market has also started to rebound, says Ken McCarthy, managing director for New York area research at Cushman & Wakefield. Midtown south, downtown and midtown Manhattan boast the three lowest vacancy rates in the nation—9.3%, 9.9% and 11.5%, respectively, according to Cushman’s data.

Because the city lost a smaller proportion of its jobs in the downturn than the nation did, and because there was little significant new construction during the boom, local vacancy rates are below the national average of 14.8%, Mr. McCarthy adds.

Apartment rentals are surging, an indication that New Yorkers are confident in their ability to land jobs and that more people are moving here to seek work, says Economy.com’s Ms. Di Natale. She also notes that in the first quarter, the Case-Shiller Condo Price Index rose by 1.6% in the New York area—the only area in the country that posted a gain, according to Fiserv and Economy.com.

While news that the city is outstripping the U.S. on many economic fronts is positive, it’s also relative.

“We’re mostly ‘outperforming’ by ‘not doing as badly,’ ” says James Brown, chief economist at the state Department of Labor.

A truly robust recovery here will depend on the strength of a national rebound that now appears to be losing steam. For retailer Robert Schwartz, signs of hope started to appear in March, after the recession had taken a 20% chunk out of sales at his three Eneslow specialty shoe shops. Customers are starting to return, he says, but they’re buying only what they need, not what they want.

“It’s incremental daylight, not exponential daylight, because we were looking at numbers that were horrific,” Mr. Schwartz says. “It’s cautious optimism, not a real optimism.”

OPINION: “Increased jobs = increased consumer spending = increased tax revenues = reduced government subsidies = stronger profits = a stronger economy”, says Leonard Steinberg head of the Luxuryloft team and managing director of Prudential Douglas Elliman.

CORPORATION + PRIVATE CASH SAVINGS UNLEASHED

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

This morning’s Wall Street Journal reports that one year removed from the trough of the recession, American corporations continue to hoard more cash than ever. There are now tentative signs that they are finally comfortable using the money to do some shopping.

The 382 nonfinancial firms in the Standard & Poor’s 500 that have reported results for the fourth quarter of 2009 are now holding $932 billion in cash and short-term investments, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of data from Capital IQ. That sum is up 8% from the third quarter and up 31% from a year ago. And why? Cash is very cheap these days. With all this cash around, it is not surprising that the high end real estate market in Manhattan is so very active right now……with lots of all cash or mostly-cash buyers. The savings rates have also climbed dramatically.

An argument could be made that these corporations have hoarded all this cash at the expense of jobs, the one issue all politicians are blaming unanimously for the tepid economic recovery. But all this cash held in both corporations and privately will be let loose into the economy….its happening already as part of the economic cycle. This will affect inventory levels accross the board. And when inventories need to be beefed up. jobs are created. Slow, painful, and mostly it affects the lowest wage earners. I guess the politicians don’t want to say all of this out loud: its the system.

ENCOURAGING SIGNS? IS LUXURY MANHATTAN REAL ESTATE ‘HOUSING’?

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Today, reports came out on home groundbreaking. (Am I the only one annoyed at how figures are constantly ‘revised’?) So December’s figures were slightly inaccurate….why? And why the month-by-month-drama-queen reporting? I am a firm believer in watching pricing on a month by month basis, but it ceases to amaze me how many people formulate world-shattering conclusions from these monthly stats.

Groundbreaking activity for new homes increased 2.8 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 591,000 units, reversing the prior month’s weather-induced drop, a report from the Commerce Department showed on Wednesday. Analysts had expected housing starts to rise to a 580,000-unit pace. December’s housing starts were revised upwards to 575,000 units from the previously reported 557,000. Compared to January last year, starts surged 21.1 percent, the largest increase since April 2004. “It’s a positive surprise on all fronts and shows that overall demand has moved higher. That’s an important element to watch as we move through a cycle going from incentive-based to more organic growth,” said Craig Peckham, equity trading strategist at Jefferies & Co in New York.

In a separate report, the Federal Reserve said U.S. industrial production rose 0.9 percent, with manufacturing, mining and utilities all posting gains. The housing market has been a particular area of concern after a series of disappointing reports on December home sales. Some economists worry that with the Fed — the U.S. central bank — and the Treasury ending purchases of mortgage-related securities in the coming weeks, mortgage interest rates will rise, putting additional pressure on the still weak market.

In housing, groundbreaking for single-family homes rose 1.5 percent last month to an annual rate of 484,000 units after falling 3 percent in December. Starts for the volatile multifamily segment increased 9.2 percent to a 107,000-unit annual pace after rising 12.6 percent in December.

The housing market, which is at the core of the most painful economic downturn since the Great Depression, is crawling out of a three-year slump, supported by government programs. New home construction contributed to economic growth in the third quarter of 2009 for the first time since 2005.

While this is all good national news, do these figure have any bearing on the Manhattan luxury real estate market? In my mind the only effect it could have is on manhattanites wealth creation and confidence-boosting: The New York luxury real estate market has very little, if anything, to do with HOUSING. What do you think?