LuxuryBlurb

Posts Tagged ‘co-op board’

COUNTRY-WIDE REAL ESTATE MARKETS EXPLODE: A RUSSIAN INVASION?

Saturday, May 19th, 2012

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on May 20th, 2012

As news broke this week that the Thomas Juul Hansen designed penthouse at One 57 (157 West 5th Street) sold for around $ 90 million, a new record for New York City real estate pricing, I am in California observing other markets. And all I can hear is how the real estate markets around the country, especially on the high end, have come roaring back to life in prime locations. In Boston, Montecito, Miami, Bel Air, London, Monaco, new pricing records are being achieved. A friend of mine recently completed a renovation of a house in Boston: within days they had multiple bids, over the asking price.

I did find it amusing how Gary Barnett announced blatantly in the New York Times this morning that the buyer of the penthouse at One 57 was NOT Russian, as if having Russian buyers in a building would somehow de-value the building? Is it possible that the Russian selling his MAJOR apartment at Time Warner is indeed this buyer? Or is it democratically-elected-president-for-life Vladimir Putin who was simply too busy buying real estate to attend the G8 conference? Is it Borat, or just the dictator he plays in his latest movie?

I have heard similar sentiments from brokers and owners from St. Jean Cap Ferrat to Santa Barbara. Some buyers actually ask the question:  Are there many Russians in the building/neighborhood? I thought that was illegal….. Russian buyers have certainly been a potent force in the Manhattan market in the past few years: In New York, might sentiments of this nature spark the re-surgence of the tough, secretive co-op board that could prevent the sale of an apartment to a Russian without providing any reasoning for a turn-down?

BUILDING CONDO/CO-OP BOARD OVERSIGHT?

Friday, April 1st, 2011

Posted by Leonard Steinberg on April 1, 2011

No, this is not an April Fool’s joke: All of us in New York have either heard of or experienced first hand the outrageous behavior of a co-op board, and yes, even a CONDO board.

This morning the New York Times reports that a bill now before the Connecticut legislature would establish an ombudsman within the Department of Consumer Protection, in the Attorney General’s office to oversee the actions of Boards and address disputes between boards and owners of condomiums. The agency would be financed through an annual $4 fee on all condominiums. Connecticut has between 240,000 and 250,000 condo units. Manhattan has many more, and of course even more co-ops

The bill would require condominium associations to set up internal procedures to resolve disputes. Condo owners would be required to go through that process before filing a complaint with the ombudsman, for which they would pay a $35 fee. The ombudsman’s office would investigate and resolve complaints, and could impose a penalty of up to $200 for knowing violations of state statutes.

I think this would be a great idea for Manhattan. Right now, the only recourse an owner has against a runaway Board is to sue. That is absurd. It is time to make the actions of Boards much more transparent….board members have a fiduciary responsibility to the owners who elected them.